Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 15,004
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
” 26 civil society groups, including Privacy International and Open Rights Group signed an open letter to Secretary of State, Michelle Donelan, stating that the “ill-considered proposals…endanger UK residents and UK data protection. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
The findings of the Sokol study are disturbing. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 4:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, on January 23 granting EPA’s motion to dismiss American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
"The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press is studying the prevalence of so-called 'Glomar' responses to FOIA requests across the federal government," RCFP Senior Staff Attorney Adam Marshall told us. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am
Q: On April 21, 2022, the Supreme Court in Cassirer v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm
Ryan Reft, Library of Congress, has posted Gideon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 10:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:22 am
Case citation: Daniels v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 7:08 am
Bedoya v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
Yet, in 1989, in City of Richmond v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
Fang, V. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:44 pm
“Numerous studies have shown that letter-writing between incarcerated folks and loved ones outside lowers stress, reduces depression, and tightens relationships. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
County of Mono v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:02 pm
ODR is now implemented or piloted in at least 200 state and local court jurisdictions, with more to come. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 1:39 pm
A strong judiciary might well reinstate Roe v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:37 am
App. 2022) (concluding ULJ's finding was supported by substantial evidence because relator "directly questioned the safety of the vaccines" and stated that she was unwilling to take vaccine "right now" but intended to reevaluate her decision based on subsequent studies); Potter v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
The original Special Study was published nearly sixty years ago.[2] I hope that the New Special Study will generate insights that are still relevant sixty years from now. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:51 pm
In Midwest Ozone Group v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:26 am
Relying on 1868 abortion statutes, the 2022 Supreme Court held in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:26 am
Relying on 1868 abortion statutes, the 2022 Supreme Court held in Dobbs v. [read post]
