Search for: "THE PROCTER" Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,561
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2008, 6:07 pm
Procter & Gamble Co., 379 F.2d 675 (1st Cir. 1967).) [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 7:25 am
Featuring speakers from:Goodwin Procter - Attorney Douglas E. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:35 pm
The July 2008 issue, which has just reached the IPKat, contains reports on four cases: the European Court of Justice ruling in case C-275/06 Productores de Musica de Espana (Promusicae) v Telefonica de Espagna SAU, as well as three British cases of which one -- the decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in the controversial Procter & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser design air freshener design dispute (see IPKat note here), is likely to be the most heavily-thumbed by… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:42 am
"Procter & Gamble has products that were innovated on the InnoCentive network. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:23 am
"Procter & Gamble  has products that were innovated on the InnoCentive network. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:57 pm
Robert Bork has noted: “the connoisseur of bad antitrust opinions must take into account Fortner I, Utah Pie, Sealy, Schwinn, Procter & Gamble, Von’s Grocery, and many others. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:51 pm
Reddy's (represented by Budd Larner) and Teva (represented by Goodwin Procter) to the showers.The drug concerned was rabeprazole, which is part of a class of drugs known as proton pump inhibitors, which suppress gastric acid production by inhibiting action of the enzyme H+K+ATPase. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:36 am
Procter & Gamble is turning back the clock to the 70s when liquid laundry detergents were concentrated. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 4:03 pm
Please join me and my fellow Law.com blogger and co-host Bob Ambrogi as we welcome Attorney Rich Strassberg, a partner in Goodwin Procter's Litigation Department and chair of its White Collar Crime & Government Investigations Practice, to discuss the details of this criminal case. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:13 am
In this memo, Goodwin Procter lays out which companies should begin taking action to avoid potential timing problems that may affect their ongoing market access - and what specific planning steps there are to keep shelfs up and running. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:13 pm
The law firm of Goodwin Procter is stepping up its training and development of non-lawyer professional staff. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 11:56 am
Thanks to Dan Adams of Goodwin Procter, we have posted this redlined version, with a heap full of caveats and qualifiers. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 1:42 pm
Gracias a esta decisión, la empresa Procter&Gamble (P&G) ahorrará millones de libras, lo que supondrá que los consumidores de este aperitivo de 'no patata' pagarán menos por el producto. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:17 pm
”Countrywide's lawyers from Goodwin Procter responded forcefully, calling the request unprecedented and tarring CVN with profit-minded motives:There is no "public interest" here, and CVN's commercial advancement and that of its analyst client base is no reason to undo this District's long-standing policy against courtroom cameras. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:51 pm
The national tax office, however, had argued that Procter & Gamble’s Pringles fall into a category of taxable food for potato chips “and similar products made from the potato, or from potato flour, or from potato starch. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 3:15 pm
No this isn't IPKatSee Procter & Gamble v HMRC [2008] EWHC 1558 (Ch) and in particular the glorious write up here.Food gets a 0% VAT rate. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
Procter & Gamble v HMRC [2008] EWHC 1558 (Ch) (Warren J) (Thanks to the Legal Post for highlighting this case). [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 6:39 pm
What better fodder for the 4th of July than Pringles and a British tax decision: Procter & Gamble UK v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 7:23 pm
Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi welcome Attorney Rich Strassberg, a partner in Goodwin Procter's Litigation Department and chair of its White Collar Crime & Government Investigations Practice, to discuss the details of this criminal case. [read post]