Search for: "U.S. v. Taylor*"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 2:00 am
Sharp v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:52 am
There is little doubt that inflation has been a long-term trend in the U.S. for quite some time and is likely to be with us for a good long while longer. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
In Taylor & Lieberman v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:04 am
Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 (1984). [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 9:34 am
Grolier, 462 U.S. 19, 25 (1983), with added emphasis). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:04 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 3:00 pm
Supreme Court precedent in Strickland v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 4:00 pm
A recent case decided by the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
Representing the Biden administration, U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:24 am
Arthur v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 9:22 am
Deal v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
E185.96.A730 1993 Regenstein Baldwin, Lewis V. [read post]
25 May 2018, 3:10 am
If some cases, the contract can be negotiated so the prosecutor agrees to allow the defense lawyer to request at the sentencing hearing that a particular sentence is best for the accused (most appropriate), or that justice is better served by applying a certain sentencing range under the U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Brian Tamanaha, U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
To use a credit card please go to the BookLocker at:http://www.booklocker.com/books/3916.html[]===========General Index of Topics Ability to perform light duty - discontinuation of GML §207-c benefitsAdministrative proceduresAge discriminationAgreement to retire.Allowing the arbitrator to exceed authorityApplicants for §207-c benefits -a "direct causal relationshipApplication for an accident disability retirement - tie vote by review boardApplications for accidental… [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
