Search for: "US v. Smith"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 9,458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” As earlier noted, all positions in the classified service are in the competitive class unless placed in a different jurisdictional class by statute or by the civil service commission having jurisdiction [see §§41, 42 and 43 of the Civil Service Law].[23]Consistent with Article V, §6, of State Constitution, competitive examinations are used to establish eligibility for permanent appointment to positions in the competitive class. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” As earlier noted, all positions in the classified service are in the competitive class unless placed in a different jurisdictional class by statute or by the civil service commission having jurisdiction [see §§41, 42 and 43 of the Civil Service Law].[23]Consistent with Article V, §6, of State Constitution, competitive examinations are used to establish eligibility for permanent appointment to positions in the competitive class. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:54 pm
By James V. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:23 pm
Upon denial of Apple’s prior petitions, the company sought to argue that these denials were unlawful because the NHK-Fintiv Rule, used to justify them, exceeds the PTO’s authority under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Hardwicke, The Use and Disuse of the Magna Carta: Due Process, Juries, and Punishment, 46 N.C. [read post]
Why Carefully Designed Public Vaccination Mandates Can—and Should—Withstand Constitutional Challenge
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
And although there has been significant clamor among conservatives to overrule Smith (including three justices expressly endorsing such a move in June’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
” (p.228) “Constructive,” here, “means useful and forward-looking. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:46 am
Smith, 152 Ill. 2d 229, 263 (1992). [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:46 pm
In Screws v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:50 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am
Cathay Smith: Do you foresee a point in time at which an AI might be able to make a fair use/fair dealing decision in the moment? [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 3:08 am
It is not clear what standard the Court would use to replace the standard in Smith. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 5:38 am
Smith: Smith Opening Brief US Answer Brief Lower court materials here. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:41 pm
We thank all our readers and contributors who have supported us over the past year. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
" See Smith Int’l v. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 10:45 am
In Gaddy v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Contact us anytime by tweeting us at @gebauerm or @glambert. [read post]
