Search for: "United States v. Childs"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 8,781
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2010, 2:31 pm
“The Federal and State Constitutions protect the inviolability of the family unit. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:51 am
The reimbursement rights of the VA are written into law and are set out in the 1990 case, United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:29 am
The court further held that the child’s habitual residence was France because, “based on the full record,” the “parties did not leave France in a manner that would suggest a shared intent to relocate indefinitely to the United States,” and evidence of the child’s acclimatization to the United States did not supplant that intent. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:53 pm
The parents had the child smuggled into the United States, where she lived with her father. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:19 pm
United States, a case in which the Court granted cert. today. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 4:29 pm
" United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm
Attorney General of the United States reversed a district court’s dismissal of a First Amendment overbreadth challenge to Section 2257 of... [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 10:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:30 am
" Montoya admitted also that D.S.D.'s desire to remain in the United States wavered. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:27 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act, active efforts)Santiago v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
" United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:57 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that applying "the unclean hands doctrine would undermine the Hague Convention's goal of protecting the well-being of the child, of restoring the status quo before the child's abduction, and of ensuring that rights of custody... of one Contracting State are effectively respected in the other Contracting States." [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
In Headifen v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
, United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:14 am
" Blondin v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:20 pm
Instances of "simulated" child sexual conduct - computer generated or made by young-looking adults - are not judged under the super-special First Amendment exception for child pornography, but rather under the merely special First Amendment exception for obscenity. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 1:10 pm
Respondent and the children remained in the United States. [read post]
