Search for: "United States v. Edwards"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,990
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
The requirement to investigate does not depend on a complaint from the victim or next-of-kin: once the matter has come to the attention of the authorities they must act of their own motion (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II). [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
In the United States we call the units dollars; the Germans have marks, the Chinese use renminbis. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:00 pm
In the United States we call the units dollars; the Germans have marks, the Chinese use renminbis. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
The Illinois / Chicago resource guide for individuals with cerebral palsy and special needs was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:16 pm
Counteracting the 2010 Citizens United case and the 1976 Buckley v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm
T.M.H., Appellant, v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
Several patent-related cases, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
Texas, 18-9674, and United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Almost all states had some kind of blue-sky law by 1931. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:51 pm
United States and Hill v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 1:22 am
The panelists were Lucian Simmons, the Head of Provenance Research at The Metropolitan Museum of Art; Jane Levine, a founder of The ArtRisk Group; Edward Diskant, Co-Head of the Global White-Collar and Government Investigations Practice at McDermott Will & Emery LLP; Noah Solowiejczyk, Co-Chief of the Illicit Finance and Money Laundering Unit at the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York; and Anna Rubin, Director of the… [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:38 am
” In State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 3:01 am
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Fortress's first motion to dismiss Apple and Intel's complaint, but also allowed the plaintiffs to amend the complaint. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am
In Edwards v United Kinghdom (2002) 35 EHRR 19, it said only that: …there must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results to secure accountability in practice as well as in theory. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 4:01 pm
United StatesMeriwether v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am
The federal judge to whom the case was assigned began his analysis of this issue by noting that a “challenge to a statute on First Amendment grounds requires that I first consider whether the speech . . . is protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Jun 2025, 4:34 am
In passing in Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, lawmakers made it clear the statute applied within any state or territory where persons sought to “overthrow, or to put down . . . the government of the United States, or to levy war against the United States” and made it “lawful for the President of the United States, when in his judgment the public safety shall require it, to suspend the privileges of the writ of habeas corpus,… [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am
” Of course, that litigation process within the states may involve rulings from the United States Supreme Court, as in Bush v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
*** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARECivil Action No. [read post]
