Search for: "United States v. Gay"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,810
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2019, 9:32 am
The opinion at issue is Morrissey v. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
This list was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:39 am
Gore or last month's Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:16 pm
Cos. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
Perry v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Texas, in 2003, and United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 2:38 am
”, is to put pressure on the state legislature to make Arizona the 38th ratifying state to satisfy Article V of the Constitution. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 pm
United States, 354 U. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The 1938 ruling in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 7:18 am
" For example, she described a 1929 decision, Fisher v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Casey to his famous series of gay rights decisions: from Romer v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 4:31 pm
The Court then requested additional briefing on the pending issues of whether the Chief Judge possessed authority to issue the administrative order and whether the interpretations and applications of the United States Constitution by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals are supreme and modify any Kansas state ban on same-sex marriage.Read More: Kansas Supreme Court blocks gay marriage licensesThe post Justia Weekly Writers’ Picks – October 17, 2014… [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:57 pm
Last June, in the decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:57 am
Moreover, we note that the Third District Court, in Florida Department of Children & Families v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 5:22 pm
Sharma et al. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:15 am
’s foundational premise of heterosexual parenting and nonrecognition of same-sex couples is unsustainable, particularly in light of the enactment of same-sex marriage in New York State, and the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Obergefell v Hodges (576 US __, 135 S Ct 2584 [2015]), which noted that the right to marry provides benefits not only for same-sex couples, but also the children being raised by those couples. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Hobby Lobby’s interpretation that it does would open the floodgates to exempt every business owner in the United States from the anti-discrimination laws, because there is no real middle ground. [read post]
