Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 1321 - 1340 of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
(On the Application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1388 (Admin) - read judgment   1 Crown Office Row’s John Joliffe appeared for the Secretary of State the Home Department in this case. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:47 am by Eric Goldman
” Plus, “The allegedly infringing images was stored on Valuewalk’s server in the United States, was accessible from computers within the United States, and its use was directed towards United States readers. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:06 pm by Oyez Project
United States In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:30 am by John McFarland
Water from the aquifer has made the arid high plains one of the most prolific agricultural regions of the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:50 am by Florian Mueller
The article also mentions two other German venues, Munich and Dusseldorf, that are considerably faster than United States district courts. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 2:29 am by gmlevine
Rather, the loser’s recourse is to commence a de novo law suit under the national law of its jurisdiction which, in the case of the United States would be a claim under the Lanham Act. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 9:25 am by Florian Mueller
Unlike in the United States, where patent cases can be filed with any of the 94 federal district courts (and can then be heard by any federal judge), only seven German courts handle patent infringement actions in the first instance (with specialized divisions focusing on patent law).All in all, Germany's share of European patent cases still appears to be growing. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:43 am by Thomas P. Gulick
The Supreme Court of the United States has taken on two high-profile intellectual property cases, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
The Supreme Court's broad and inclusive approach to exhaustion simply doesn't allow any kind of end-run around the exhaustion doctrine through a first sale outside the United States as in one of the two issues relevant in the Lexmark case. [read post]