Search for: "United States v. House of Representatives of United States" Results 1321 - 1340 of 4,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 3:49 pm by Eric Muller
The most notable of these was undoubtedly his argument for the House of Representatives in I.N.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:00 am by Jeffrey Kahn
Munitions were dropped directly on houses, town squares, and churches. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:26 am by Dennis Crouch
 Note here that the argument is not based upon a statute codified in the United States Code since it is only a temporary provision that will sunset after three more years. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
" It is clear there is bipartisan support in both Houses for a stand alone, fully retroactive judicial pay raise. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 2:40 pm
Ferguson; Whereas Thurgood Marshall was nominated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit by President John F. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:38 am by PJ Blount
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:31 am
Jason Getsy (and remember, it's not too late to write Governor Strickland and urge him to commute Getsy's death sentence) or United States of America v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 7:15 am by Venkat Balasubramani
” The plaintiffs tried to marshal additional facts, such as that Nehlen was running for a seat in the House of Representatives and tweeted the message to his supporters in Michigan, but Michigan stood sixth on the list of states where his supporters lived. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
   Details of this year’s National Defense Authorization Act are starting to trickle out of the House of Representatives and Politico has the scoop. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
Sanders, the Court turned its attention to the House of Representatives, agreeing with the dissenter on the three-judge district court, who had “relied on Baker v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
If the House of Representatives passes a bill, it does not become law without the concurrence of the Senate and the President (or, if the President vetoes, a supermajority of both houses). [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
I’ll be testifying this afternoon before the House Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy hearing on “Examining the State of Judicial Recusals After Caperton v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 5:30 am by Kevin
        Related StoriesIn re: Sssotlohiefmjn v. [read post]