Search for: "United States v. Li" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2014, 10:36 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
  As the court stated: This is not a case in which information necessary to state a claim lies within the exclusive providence of an adverse party. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:51 am by Charlotte Garden
… The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:32 am
Busy day in that the Sixth published four criminal cases: two direct appeals and two habeas cases.The first of the direct appeals was United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:03 pm by INFORRM
These judgments typically are never enforced in the United States, because every state has a public-policy exception to its enforcement doctrines and most recognize First Amendment concerns as part of that public policy. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
United States and what it might ultimately mean for the president’s power to raise the debt limit on his own in a future crisis. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:29 am by admin
NEW YORK—The Justice Department alleged May 3 a wholly owned Deutsche Bank AG subsidiary fraudulently misrepresented its mortgage lending and underwriting practices for years while participating in a federal mortgage-insurance program that to date has led to $386 million in losses (United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:54 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
In addition to the SSI fraud alleged, the Massachusetts woman is also alleged to have defrauded the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or what people used to be called food stamps program administered by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). [read post]