Search for: "United States v. One Package"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
I talked earlier in the year with a lawyer who convinced a court that her client’s dog breeding operation was a livestock facility, United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:50 pm
The general rule in the United States is that either there is a carve-out for the committee bringing suit on behalf of the entity, or there potentially is no coverage. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
The rule on this head is aptly stated by Mr. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Not one. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the equivalent state level agencies. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
, Schering-Plough Corp – Following dispute over trade dress with Schering-Plough, Fruit of the Earth announces plan to change its package design: (IP Law360), US: Quanta and its impact on biotechnology: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), US: BIO files amicus brief asking CAFC to cabin in scope of KSR and hold that its obvious to try dicta does not abrogate the Deuel standard: In re Kubin: (Patently-O), US: StemCells gets patent on enriched central nervous system stem cell and… [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:00 am
Kwon v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
It will then treat the two (or more) people as a unit and treat the unit differently from how it would treat those same people individually. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 8:48 am
There's a federal case from the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
Because the Fourth Amendment says, The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. 5 Most people would feel it was unreasonable to believe that just because they gave one of their… [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
Click Here EPA settles with Clear Lam packaging on hazardous waste violations; penalty, environmental project ordered. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
Click Here EPA settles with Clear Lam packaging on hazardous waste violations; penalty, environmental project ordered. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 4:37 am
Schedule I According to the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Schedule I drugs generally have no currently acceptable medicinal application and are likely to be abused. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
And, as with other useful arts, the United States, and most other countries, recognize the importance of protecting the intellectual property rights of the designers, inventors, artisans and engineers responsible for creating furniture designs. [read post]
15 May 2022, 8:02 pm
Milgaard was provided a compensation package by the federal government for his wrongful conviction in 1999. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
” Even “more critically,” he added, “no court should be able to order than an alien captured and detained abroad during wartime be admitted and released into the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court landmark case, United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
The workaround is packaging ideas into bigger and bigger units, which have been termed “chunks”. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
” Brief for the United States as Amicus CuriaeSupporting Respondents, 2011 WL 741927, at *19, see Mensing, 131 S. [read post]
