Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,557
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 3:51 am
Ditto for the forty United States Supreme Court opinions referencing the term. [read post]
23 May 2010, 6:25 am
This is part of the same company that was subject of last year’s United States Supreme Court decision in Caperton v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am
In addition to California, the other states with at least a few such prisoners are Delaware, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Virginia. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
– Enviro.BLR.com, May 5, 2010 A major railway company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged CWA and CERCLA violations for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, South Carolina. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:54 am
The United States Court of Appeals has issued a decision in regards to U.S. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
More than 40 of the sites are in North Carolina. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:16 pm
Our South Carolina attorneys have a vast amount of experience in both state and federal courts and handle criminal cases all over the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
United States, and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:43 am
On April 26, 2010, the South Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the South Carolina Public Service Commission (Commission) approving SCE&G’s application to construct and operate a two-unit nuclear facility in Jenkinsville, South Carolina and to revise its rates to reflect the cost of capital applied to the project. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:31 am
It helped arrange for shipping of the goods to California and South Carolina for distribution throughout the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Supp. 1309 (D.S.C. 1983) (interpreting South Carolina law); DiNatale v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm
"The institution is not going in the direction he thinks it should," he said.That was clear this year when he was on the losing side in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:24 pm
Additionally, the states of Alabama, Virginia, Texas, Alaska, Michigan, Nebraska, Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Dakota, South Dakota Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah are joining with the objectors. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am
Dear ColleaguesI hope you find useful to have the links to the new issue of OPINIO JURIS in COMPARATIONE. once again we look forward to host contribution from our Juris Diversitatis group.If you have problems to read the post, please let me know.With my bestsciaoGiovanni #ssrnholder { font-face: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; } #ssrnholder #outline{ border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; border-color: #003366; max-width: 700px; } #ssrnholder table{ max-width: 700px;} #ssrnholder… [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
Appellees filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, notice of which was sent to counsel for the Appellant via the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system utilized by the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina (and functionally similar to that used by the District Court of South Carolina). [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Allen argument 1/20/2010 South Carolina v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 2:45 am
In particular, two recent federal cases, United States v. [read post]
