Search for: "V D" Results 1321 - 1340 of 75,117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 6:29 am by Eleonora Rosati
The burden is therefore placed on the courts to triage these issues for the time being with the definitive outcome of Getty Images v Stability AI being eagerly awaited.Turning to training, a different perspective was offered from the current state of law within the European Union. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Following the hearing, the arbitrator makes a nonbinding recommendation to defendant as to the appropriate penalty or whether any further action should be taken, which recommendation defendant may reverse, remand or dismiss (see 19 NYCRR 941.13 [a], [c], [d]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Following the hearing, the arbitrator makes a nonbinding recommendation to defendant as to the appropriate penalty or whether any further action should be taken, which recommendation defendant may reverse, remand or dismiss (see 19 NYCRR 941.13 [a], [c], [d]). [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 1:14 pm
’s transfer to NSH, DSH filed a petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) for an interim order to compel involuntary medication of D.K. with antipsychotic medication. . . .Pursuant to section 1370, subdivision (a)(2)(D)(i), an administrative law judge (ALJ) conducted an evidentiary hearing on January 20, 2023. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
§ 254(d) that would require federal Universal Service Fund contributions by ISPs: “[W]e believe that any decisions on whether and how to make BIAS providers contribute to USF funding are best addressed holistically in [] ongoing discussions of USF contribution reform, on a full record and with robust input from all interested parties, than in this proceeding. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:00 am by Unknown
Fort de l’analyse de réunions et documents de l’OIM, l’ouvrage révèle comment divers fonctionnaires internationaux, diplomates et experts ont formulé, diffusé, matérialisé ou encore contesté la gestion migratoire. [read post]