Search for: "V Force Customs, Inc."
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2015, 7:09 am
Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., August 14, 2015, Pooler, R.). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am
On the latter element, the Court noted that “only” 10–15% of FanDuel’s total revenue was derived from New York customers. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:09 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubrmani, with comments from Eric] In re Google Inc. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
In an action for equitable relief brought in connection with a failed employment relationship, the plaintiffs asserted that the defendant, Competitive Technologies, Inc. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 8:53 pm
” Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. 17-11414 (D. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:57 pm
” Theatre Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),Michael Geist: presentation on open access, focusing on why adopting open access models can help counter restrictive contractual terms and copyright laws: (Michael Geist),Audacity – Sometimes sheer audacity can overcome superior forces, or a well-entrenched position: (IP ThinkTank),Presentation on IPR and professional opportunities for advocates and chartered accountants: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),Grand (IP)… [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm
As the study points out, corporate America “now seems comfortable and even excited with its newfound ability to engage its vendors, partners, customers, and others in ways that could not have been imagined when most of their corporations began. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm
Dyson, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:53 pm
Horton, Inc v NLRB as the agency moved to invalidate employers’ mandatory arbitration agreements gave its seal of approval to the Board’s rejection of a nonunion company’s handbook rule in what, incidentally, had been a divided decision below. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 7:17 pm
The Tribunal justified this distinction by referring to a number of B.C. cases, Mailloux v Tofino (District) at para 111, and Whistler (Resort Municipality) v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm
Health plans, their employer and other sponsors and fiduciaries, health insurers, health care providers, health care clearinghouses and their business associates should study and learn from the just announced, record-setting $16 million resolution agreement between health insurance giant, Anthem, Inc., to resolve Department of Health & Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) charges that Anthem, Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 12:34 pm
Real USFL, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:28 am
In support of its position, the insurer relied on case law (including the Seventh Circuit’s 2001 opinion in Level 3 Communications Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Lanier Collection Agency & Serv., Inc., 486 U.S. 825, 837 (1988))); Babbitt v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
Stamer helps public and private, domestic and international businesses, governments, and other organizations and their leaders manage their employees, vendors and suppliers, and other workforce members, customers and other’ performance, compliance, compensation and benefits, operations, risks and liabilities, as well as to prevent, stabilize and cleanup workforce and other legal and operational crises large and small that arise in the course of operations. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
They are used to receiving information that is current and relevant to them, and they expect the same ability to preselect and customize the information they receive in the workplace. [read post]