Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 1321 - 1340 of 6,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 6:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court holds that a Minnesota law that prohibits people from wearing political clothing in a polling place violates the First Amendment.The case is Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Andrew Hamm
City of Riviera Beach, and on Wednesday in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:24 pm
/**/ Here are a couple of reports about yesterday's decision by the Hawaii Supreme Court in Dupree v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
So if you think (as the voters do here) that it should be a violation of the Constitution for a state to only allow registered members of a party to vote in that party's primary, then by all means, feel free to make that argument.But the Supreme Court held back in 1990 that it was unconstitutional for states (like California) to require an open primary when that's not what the party wants. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:48 pm
 There's no way the voters thought that a guy who uses a wirecutter to snip off sensor tags has should invariably stay in prison for life whereas a guy who snips 'em off with his bare hands should be let go.Just not plausible. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:37 pm
 In 2012, the voters passed Proposition 36, which changed the three strikes law and permitted a ton of currently sentenced three-strikers to file a motion to recall their sentence. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:50 pm
 The Court of Appeal demonstrates its cultural awareness as well:"Defendants . . . . contend the measure summary and impartial analysis that appeared in the ballot pamphlet materials for Proposition D described the ordinance as authorizing delivery of medical marijuana by vehicles and they maintain that the voters enacting the proposition adopted that construction. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:59 pm by Matt Cooper
Secretary of State solidified that voters will use the ranked-choice method for November’s Presidential election. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am by Jeff Gamso
Patrik Jonsson in the Christian Science Monitor wonders if this isn't a "turning point" for Joe.But if the court ruling represents a victory for immigration advocates and a legal reversal for Arpaio, it's also clear that, even before the ruling, Arpaio had been losing support among more educated white voters even as opposition against him had galvanized among ascendant Hispanic voters, the Arizona Capital Times newspaper reported recently. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:57 am
Appellate Judges: I was amazed that New York voters dumped three appellate judges. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:57 am
Appellate Judges: I was amazed that New York voters dumped three appellate judges. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in Benisek v. [read post]