Search for: "William T Harris" Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The previously unreported ad buys for Trump’s re-election campaign routed through a secretive limited-liability company known as Harris Sikes Media LLC were revealed in Federal Communications Commission rec [read post]
17 May 2023, 7:51 am by Mariah Bowman
Climate change is a looming threat that includes rising sea levels, unpredictable storms, and the destruction of seaports.[1] Island nations are at risk of economic collapse since they rely on ports for almost all their trade.[2] When Hurricane Dorian struck the Bahamas in 2019, the severe storms damaged ports causing a loss of approximately $3.4 billion.[3] Additionally, natural hazards are the costliest for ports in the Philippines, Guinea-Bissau, Dominica, the Northern Mariana Islands, and… [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:13 am
LAW FIRM LAYOFF LIST - MAY 2009Law firms that are conducting May 2009 layoffs in their U.S. offices are listed here:Sullivan & Cromwell (15-20 attorneys)Seyfarth Shaw (30 attorneys, 20 staff)Eckert Seamans (119 temp. attorneys by 7/1)Fenwick & West (15 attorneys, 7 staff)Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy (49 attorneys, 40 staff)Thompson & Knight (17 attorneys, 25 staff)Ruden McClosky (2 attorneys, 18 staff)Snell & Wilmer (30-40 staff)McDonough Holland &… [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
The question is: how many more layoffs will we see in the coming months.LAW FIRM LAYOFF LIST - JUNE 2009Law firms that are conducting June 2009 layoffs in their U.S. offices are listed here:Barlows Clyde & Gilbert (49 staff)Bass Berry (10 attorneys, 22 staff)Clifford Chance (10 attorneys)Cravath (25 attorneys)Dorsey & Whitney (55 staff)Dykema (17 attorneys, 30 staff)Honigman Miller (11 attorneys)McDermott Will & Emery (25 attorneys, 47 staff)Miller Canfield Paddock and Stone… [read post]
25 May 2009, 2:48 am
The question is: how many more layoffs will we see in the coming months.LAW FIRM LAYOFF LIST - MAY 2009Law firms that are conducting May 2009 layoffs in their U.S. offices are listed here:Sullivan & Cromwell (15-20 attorneys)Seyfarth Shaw (30 attorneys, 20 staff)Eckert Seamans (119 temp. attorneys by 7/1)Fenwick & West (15 attorneys, 7 staff)Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy (49 attorneys, 40 staff)Thompson & Knight (17 attorneys, 25 staff)Ruden McClosky (2 attorneys, 18… [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:15 am by Lyle Denniston
A beginning that is totally free of ambiguity came when President Harry Truman deployed U.S. troops to South Korea in 1950 after North Korean troops had invaded. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Again this week, I saw the video exchange when Majority Leader Harry Reid decided not to include Sen. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 11:25 am by Sebastian Brady
At the Daily Beast, Shane Harris and Tim Mak describe Yemen as the “New Terror Heartland” and wonder if the administration’s previous strategy in Yemen, centered largely around drone strikes, was too narrow. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
In other news, a former soldier in Prince Harry’s regiment has been found not guilty of committing misconduct in a public office by selling stories to two tabloid papers. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The many dissents of Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall (later joined by Justice Harry Blackmun) in death penalty cases, in which they argued that the imposition of a criminal penalty of death violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against the cruel and unusual punishments, has not (at least not yet) translated into a majority opinion or even into mainstream public opinion. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But when we call voting or marriage a fundamental right that triggers strict scrutiny, we may have strayed across the negative/affirmative rights line; elections and civil marriages don’t t [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Harry, 816 F.3d 1268 (10th Cir. 2016) (ruling against Indian sexual assault defendant) Sanders v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
If a state can’t regulate federal entities or employees in such a way as to frustrate accomplishment of federal policies, neither should it be able to regulate federal contractors, or individuals who otherwise voluntarily choose to cooperate or associate with the federal government, if the same frustration of federal policy would result.One way to appreciate the centrality of this supremacy principle is to imagine a converse partisan equation. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:37 am by Adam Faderewski
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in January 2019 of the deaths of these members. [read post]