Search for: "cf"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 5,149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2009, 3:46 am
Contrary to the conclusion implicitly reached by the Supreme Court, the term "child" is not ordinarily used to refer to sons-in-law or daughters-in-law (cf. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:43 am
One--word answer: health, and Robin is doing some followup analysis of the health findings right now (three-word advice: skip cancer screening (link; cf. link)). [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 4:54 am
Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 124 (2000) ("Headlong flight ... is the consummate act of evasion"), it is clear, and I find, that McCrae's behavior fell well short of this threshold, cf. id. at 125 ("'[R]efusal to cooperate, without more, does not furnish the minimal level of objective justification needed for a detention or seizure.'" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 437)). [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:05 pm
In any event, at least the debate did not turn to the value of the "cf. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 5:46 am
Cf. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:43 pm
Cf. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:07 pm
CF/EH [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 9:24 pm
Humphrey, 208 F.3d 1190, 1204 (10th Cir. 2000) (if trial testimony would support a different legal justification for suppressing evidence, the defendant must inform the trial court of that new justification in renewing suppression motion at trial); cf. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 7:34 pm
Cf. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 3:57 pm
Cf. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:58 am
., 544 U.S. 197, 221 (2005); cf. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:57 am
Cf. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 5:40 am
Cf. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 10:55 am
Cf. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:04 pm
Better than flying to Mars, the Dept. of Education, half our military CF's -- the list could go on. [read post]
4 May 2012, 4:05 pm
CF/CG [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
Bascomb, 451 F.3d 1292, 1296–97 (11th Cir. 2006) (interests of the government and defendants); cf. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:09 am
Cf. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:40 pm
Cf. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:10 pm
Cf. id., at 35 (noting that a particular juror “did not know whose idea it was to send the chocolate penis to the judge,” but not including any representation as to her understanding of why the gifts may have been given (emphasis added)). [read post]
