Search for: "BE v. State"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 258,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
State v. Huey: Repeatedly Insinuating that the Defendant Was a Liar Was Improper but Not Prejudicial
3 Oct 2017, 11:13 am
” State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
See State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:08 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:29 pm
CAAF heard oral argument last week in the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
The post Vacatur and United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:35 pm
The Court devotes two thirds of its opinion to addressing Young's legal insufficiency claim, and to revisiting the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 7:39 am
STATE, 378 MD. 646 (2003); MORA v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:41 am
Regina (Abdi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Khalaf) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 242; [2011] WLR (D) 78 “In deciding whether a foreign national facing deportation had been detained for too long it was right to consider what had happened since the start of the detention and to consider all the relevant factors in the context of the time so far spent in detention and to ask in all the circumstances whether this was a reasonable time for effecting the… [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:33 am
Regina (Smith) v Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxfordshire; Secretary of State for Defence v Same Queen’s Bench Division “The right to life, protected by article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, could extend to members of the Armed Forces, wherever they might be; whether it did so would depend on the circumstances of the particular case. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:50 am
R (F (A Child)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Thompson) v Same [2010] UKSC 17; [2010] WLR (D) 98 “The indefinite notification requirements for sexual offenders who had been sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment or more were incompatible with the right to respect for private and family life because they did not contain any mechanism for reviewing the justification for continuing the requirements in individual cases. [read post]
Y (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Z (Sri Lanka) v Same - Times Law Reports
5 May 2009, 2:09 am
Y (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Z (Sri Lanka) v Same Court of Appeal “It would be a breach of article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, prohibiting torture, to order the return of an asylum seeker to a country where there was an undisturbed finding that the asylum seeker [...] [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:02 am
There continues to be much commentary on the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:03 am
The Court granted the State's petition for review without oral argument in this Hays County assault case on the following issue: Arevalo v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:25 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 3:18 am
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:45 pm
In the recent case, Heiting v. the United States, an appellate court denied a claim-of-right deduction in accordance with Section 1341 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
Galit Raguan (Berkeley Law) has posted Masquerading Justiciability: The Misapplication of State Secrets Doctrine in Mohamed v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:21 am
R (A) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] EWCA Civ 225; [2009] WLR (D) 113 “A failed asylum seeker was not ‘ordinarily resident’ within the United Kingdom for the purposes of entitlement to treatment as of right by the National Health Service free of charge. [read post]
20 May 2013, 2:30 am
United States. [read post]
