Search for: "Barrett v. State" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:25 pm by Jennifer Papapanagiotou
Texas On January 18, 2022, the State of Texas filed a motion to dismiss its claims in Texas v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Katherine Shaw
The Court then invoked its increasingly familiar “major questions doctrine” which, as the Court explained in West Virginia v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Lisa Soronen offers “A Tribute to Justice Ginsburg from a State and Local Government Perspective” for the National League of Cities. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 8:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Re whether I could repost it, and he graciously agreed: The Court recently heard argument in Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:25 pm by Josh Blackman
But after Justice Barrett's confirmation in October 2020, the strategy shifted. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:56 am by Andrew Hamm
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:21 am by Mark Walsh
He announces that orders have been released and then that Justice Amy Coney Barrett has the opinion of the court in Arellano v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:14 am by Rachit Buch
The process to be followed in Article 8 claims is straightforward, and is summarised by Immigration Judge Pitt in this case at paragraph 15, which mentions the leading case of R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Roberts stated that he would “discard[]” the “viability line established by Roe” and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA v. [read post]