Search for: "Britain v. Britain" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
IPSO 06393-21 Minto v Sunday People, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 01933-21 Muslim Council of Britain v thejc.com, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02814-21 Kent v straffordshire-live.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019). 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 07428-21 Daunt v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am by Colin Murray
Of course, the criminalisation of homosexuality was discussed in Parliament in the same era and that didn’t stop the UK and Ireland from having to revisit that issue at the behest of Strasbourg decisions in Dudgeon v UK and Norris v Ireland. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Some athletes have been advised to leave laptops and phones at home, while others — including athletes from Canada, Germany and Great Britain — are being provided temporary devices. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
London Internet Exchange (LINX) faces a growing backlash over changes to its rules that would gag its directors applying secret government orders to monitor networks, under Britain’s Investigatory Powers Act. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics 1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor   Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and  Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment 1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William   On Conveyancers' Evidence 1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas   On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Events 16 March 2016 Seminar: Openness in Britain 2016 – Where are we now? [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in Wasserman v Freilich. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:04 pm by Elin Hofverberg
Väinö Tanner 5 years, 6 months imprisonment. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:36 am by INFORRM
   This case has, for instance, been dubbed Britain’s #MeToo scandal with Sir Philip playing the role of Harvey Weinstein. [read post]
  This was the case in R v Rogers [2014] EWCA Crim 1680, where there was no act of money laundering in England but it was sufficient that the underlying fraud generating the criminal property took place in England and there were English victims. [read post]