Search for: "Casey v State" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,549
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Six of which cited the case for its procedural holding.(4) See Barry Miller and Casey Stansbury, Iqbal Energizes Motion to Dismiss Practice (March 10, 2010) (discussing Iqbal’s influence in state court matters).(5) In Siemens Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 10:03 am
No -- Why Rivkin and Casey Are Wrong UPDATE: It is unclear that a state attorney general would even have standing to bring a suit in federal court regarding the mandate. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:11 am
Baker Hostetler Partners Take Up States' Challenge of Health Care Overhaul The National Law Journal Baker Hostetler partners David Rivkin Jr. and Lee Casey have signed on as outside counsel to several state attorneys general who want the national health care legislation overturned in court. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:12 am
Hearing officer recommends dismissal of employee who submitting a false affidavit claiming she was unemployedNYC Human Resources Administration v Johnson, OATH Index #1187/10OATH Administrative Law Judge Kevin Casey recommended that the Human Resources Administration terminate Alyce Johnson, an eligibility specialist employed by New York City, after finding that Johnson had falsified affidavits submitted to the New York City Housing Authority stating that she was… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
 The Wall Street Journal — with many friends on both sides of the conservative debate, including Andy McCarthy on one side and David Rivkin and Lee Casey on the Wittes letter — offered a sensible disentangling of the issues.) [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:47 am by Steve Hall
"This will not be the last case in which similar arguments are made," says Niland, who is not involved in State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:22 pm
The Appellate Division reversed the lower court’s ruling and directed Garden City “to defend and indemnify” Cotter in the civil action brought by McCarthy.In the words of the Appellate Division, “The Legislature created Education Law §3811 to protect teachers from a broader array of claims than those encompassed by Education Law §3023, citing Casey v Tieman, 110 AD2d 167. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm by WIMS
      In April 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:21 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
These charges were brought in a superseding indictment in United States v. [read post]