Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 4,823
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2012, 9:11 am
See a NY Times review of Dale Carpenter's new book "Flagrant Conduct," telling the story of Lawrence v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 8:34 am
The case is FCC v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:34 am
The two December cases are Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 11:28 am
The crime scene described at the beginning of United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Chambers, 473 F.3d 724, 726 (7th Cir. 2007) (escape is a crime of violence); United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:02 pm
Ground 5 – Level of damages Relying on the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland’s decision in McGaughey v Sunday Newspapers Ltd [2011] NICA 51, Facebook contends that the award of £20,000 damages is excessive and inconsistent with dicta stating that “modest” damages are appropriate for the misuse of private information. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:32 am
Background In Fedotova and Others v Russia [2023] ECHR 55, the six applicants formed three same-sex couples: two female and one male. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:40 pm
A five judge panel of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has decided not to allow a full hearing take place in relation to the case of Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:01 am
IANAL, but my personal view was that SB 187 did not provide enough discretion on sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:19 am
In this post, Matthew Purchase QC of Matrix Chambers discusses the Supreme Court’s decision in the matter of T (A Child) [2021] UKSC 35. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:28 am
This week, the state supreme court heard oral arguments on the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:10 am
Home Group Ltd was followed by the Lands Tribunal in Chand v Calmore Area Housing Ltd (LRX/170/2007). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:10 am
Home Group Ltd was followed by the Lands Tribunal in Chand v Calmore Area Housing Ltd (LRX/170/2007). [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 3:38 pm
On Thursday, the Supreme Court decided Ramirez v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 3:26 pm
Ethics, State Bar of Tex., Op. 39 (1978).) [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:57 am
(R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ¶ 77, supra.). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 6:12 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 11:27 am
Bahar Idriss Abu Garda and The Prosecutor v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
