Search for: "Childs v. State"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 21,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2012, 5:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 8:38 am
Source: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/767/v/481 Read More [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
Taxpayers may claim a maximum credit of $2,000 for each child, with a portion of the credit refundable. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:48 am
Petitioner argued that the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 8:23 pm
Its decision in June in Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 6:10 am
The state of Illinois determines child support payments using a strategy known as the “income shares method. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:57 pm
When the child was five, Father had taken the child from Turkey to the United States. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:09 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 7:32 pm
That a significant majority of States has enacted statutes to protect child witnesses from the trauma of giving testimony in child abuse cases attests to the widespread belief in the importance of such a public policy. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 9:24 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinions: State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:39 am
The children were removed from Honduras and brought to the United States in January 2022. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 7:02 am
State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:18 am
Like Miranda v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:50 pm
The ruling in H.M. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:16 pm
Pecore v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:20 am
Privileged Information and Discoverable Material In Heijman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
However, a federal appeals ruling last week in Massachusetts (Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 8:22 am
You may read Mann v Pischke here. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:44 am
State was not a custody kidnapping case, but rather a case of child abuse with an imprisonment component. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:54 am
The United States Court of Appeals has issued a decision in regards to U.S. v. [read post]
