Search for: "Cohen v. State"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See Sutton v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
" See Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:43 am
Orton-Bell v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
” Kazakhastan The Committee to Protect Journalists website has a piece “Kazakhstan decriminalizes defamation, but maintains detentions, criminal penalties for speech offenses” United States The Independent reports that a New York judge has allowed Roy Moore to proceed with his defamation case against comedian Sacha Baron Cohen, over a prank that he claims portrayed him as a paedophile. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am
In a piece at Time, Adam Cohen offers detailed background on Skinner v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
First on the agenda is Murr v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:42 pm
Indeed, the federal ban on marijuana is responsible for Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Cohen V. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:02 am
S.A. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm
Early Republic Borderlands: Indian Removal, Slavery, and Non-State ActorsChair: David Waldstreicher, Temple University “Fraught with Disastrous Consequences for our Country”: Cherokee Removal and Nullification, 1824–1839, Nancy Morgan, Temple University Women at the Crossroads: The Legal and Political Fight to Reverse Indian Removal in Seneca, 1838–1887, Taylor Spence, Yale University Reading Hearts, Not Books: Affective Literacy and Public Sentiment… [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm
He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:11 am
Doyle v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:48 am
” Another example is the Appellate Division’s 2013 decision in Mizrahi v Cohen where, stating that “in certain circumstances, a buyout may be an appropriate equitable remedy upon the dissolution of an LLC,” the court granted the petitioning 50% member’s request to compel the other 50% member to sell his interest to the petitioner at a judicially determined value. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 11:30 am
Not only has my wish not been granted, but in a matrimonial equitable distribution case decided in 2001 called Cohen v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
Hayes, Lisa Lehner, Christine Lopez-Acevedo, Louis V. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:57 am
Benjamin Franklin 1Stanz v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
There is no stated necessity that the need or the risk be significant or substantial. [read post]
