Search for: "Crawford v. State"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2007, 6:46 pm
The First provides a useful analysis for determining whether a state law crime is violent. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:31 am
Bryant - Court further refines the “primary purpose” test in determining whether a statement is testimonial, and thus barred by Crawford v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 11:24 pm
The Case of CMS v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:39 pm
See, for example, Zapata v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
In light of Crawford v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
PennsylvaniaDocket: 09-1396Issue(s): Whether a child's statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial” evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
PennsylvaniaDocket: 09-1396Issue(s): Whether a child's statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial” evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:33 am
Libertarian Party of Washington State v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:15 pm
US v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:32 am
United States, a wiretapping case. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:57 am
Crawford, Mr. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 1:42 pm
In FEC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am
Section 5’s constitutionality has also been called into question by DOJ’s refusal to preclear legislation like voter ID that is unquestionably permissible in non-covered states according to the Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
In Crawford Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:04 pm
ArizonaIn Crawford v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 4:15 am
In a landmark 2004 case called Crawford v. [read post]
