Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 1341 - 1360 of 7,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2019, 12:37 pm by Richard Hunt
It does mean though that the solution to the current website litigation crisis will not be found in standards like WCAG 2.x, whether or not they are incorporated into regulations. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 6:57 am
But painting all sex offenders with a broad brush "does a disservice to victims of sexual assault," she said, because the restrictions become meaningless.Like Mr. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:56 am by Tim Wu
  In any other area of publishing, the first thing an editor does is see what you’ve written before. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 11:00 am by Lina Angelici
Also, Rule 3-05 does not distinguish between acquisitions of stock vs. assets, nor does its applicability depend upon the structure of the transaction. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 1:20 pm
 Or maybe, in (B), Doug's Widgets sells the widgets to X, Y, and Z on credit, but then Doug's goes bankrupt.If there's legally an agreement, then presumably in (A), I can sue eBay for screwing up the sale, and in (B), Acme Manufacturing can sue X, Y, and Z for the purchase price of the widgets, right? [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 4:44 pm by Richard Primus
  But it is a matter of consensus understanding and centuries-old unbroken practice that the Monarch exercises those powers on the advice of her Ministers—which is a polite way of saying that the elected leadership of Parliament asks the Monarch to do X and the Monarch duly says “I hereby do X. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 10:30 am by Susan Brenner
X, since I find using “appellant” over and over a little tedious. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:26 am by Thom Lambert
  If it does so, I predict that it will overrule its Jefferson Parish decision, jettison the quasi-per se rule against tyi [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:01 am by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Wallis: What this bill does is say that, as a woman, that I'm not smart enough to know the decision that I'm making, that somehow the state is required in this particular decision where they are required in no other medical decision. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:44 am by Kirk Garner
It is technically incorrect to say “I am entitled to half of ‘X’. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 2:50 pm
X----------------------------------- What are the consequences if there are inconsistencies? [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  You can’t use your property to do X because of my right. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In all these examples, n is 0, and x and y are 2.In addition, data was provided for further copper corrosion inhibitors, which is summarised in the following table […]. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:51 am by VMaryAbraham
While it doesn’t always guide us to the right resources, how does it stack up against all the super-busy law firm librarians we know? [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 3:10 am by SHG
They’ll tell you if we can smooth out the Federal Register, we could save X billions of dollars, for example. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 1:17 am
CIOs who want to control non-work applications may find some good ammo for their arguments As I read the survey, it does not address a long-standing question I have: are Gen Y legal professionals more tech savvy than older generations? [read post]