Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 4,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
The global fashion industry sells more than $750 billion of apparel annually.[1] Major fashion design firms, such as Gucci, Prada, Armani, Ralph Lauren, and Chanel, produce new apparel designs continually, but market their design output via collections introduced seasonally in a series of runway shows.[2] While it is true that trends are constantly in flux, there is always a specific trend each season which dominates the runway and retail stores. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 10:59 am
… Via john v burke, with thanks. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:41 am
" In Richardson v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:01 pm
The sequel case is American Tradition Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 4:18 pm
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:18 pm
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:17 pm
Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Howes v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
In 1927 the United States Supreme Court decided Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
” Although the focus was on same-sex marriage and Alabama, coverage of and commentary on King v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Palkon v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:34 am
Notably, the Third Circuit in ZF Meritor, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
Confronted with these facts, the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
The court will revisit the issue Oct. 10, when it is scheduled to hear oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 12:25 pm
Case documents are available at https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-and-state-north-carolina-v-charlotte-mecklenburg-hosptial-authority-dba-carolinas. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:06 am
The question in Cannisnia Plantation, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:39 am
January 3, 2019 In a recent case handed down by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, in Rebuck v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Mylan also argued that, by seeking to shut out its validity challenge, Neurim’s conduct amounted to an abuse of a dominant position under s.18 of the Competition Act 1998[1]. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 3:38 pm
” Although it granted much of Mylan’s motion to dismiss, the court allowed to proceed a claim that Mylan misled investors by stating that its Medicaid rebate calculations carried “risks of errors. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 7:38 am
Distribution v. [read post]
