Search for: "Day v. United Securities Corporation"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm
When the case was first filed, eight months after President Clinton’s revelation that it was in the works (and on the same day that officials announced the end of the criminal grand jury probe with no charges being filed), the civil lawsuit focused on three federal laws — RICO and two laws dealing with federal funding of medical care and Social Security Those other two laws dropped out of the case, leaving it as purely a RICO lawsuit. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:36 pm
The Tafas v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:24 pm
I like federalism as much as the next guy, but I am not quite sure that I want to go back to the nullifying days of the antebellum period to secure it. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Additional damage is occurring every day; no end is yet in sight. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm
In Bolkus v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2010] SASC 150, the judge held that the material broadcast and published by the defendant was not capable of conveying the defamatory imputations pleaded. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am
(Milford, MA) Ajt Security Inc. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:25 pm
As Judge Levin pointed in Morefield v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
Texas) and Citizens United v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm
The JASON was first owned by Union Barge Line Corporation and was in operation from 1940 to 1959. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:45 pm
United States, 2010 U.S. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
– Business Wire, May 4, 2010 Navistar International Corporation /quotes/comstock/13*! [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:20 am
[Local Loan Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am
It involved the McCain-Feingold Act’s limit on issue ads by unions and corporations in the 60 days before an election. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:40 am
Times—SCOTUSblog’s Tom Goldstein predicts that “the Supreme Court would uphold disclosure provisions like those set forth in the DISCLOSE Act, at least as applied to the expenditures by corporations and unions that were at issue in Citizens United. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:38 pm
The president denied that he had had any day-to-day involvement with or exercised any decision-making for the particular construction project. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of paternity;(ii) for the… [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:15 am
The very concept of “debtor-in-possession” suggests a belief in the chance of renewal which is absent from the “receivership style” of insolvency prevalent outside the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:09 pm
The case, Saleh et al v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:51 am
A few days before the patent application was filed, the inventors assigned their rights to Avid. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Assisted Living v. [read post]
