Search for: "Dev"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2020, 7:49 am
. * Mark McKenna, Innovating Trademark Theory, JOTWELL (November 20, 2020) (reviewing Dev Saif Gangjee, Trade Marks and Innovation? [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 7:52 am
., Stoneridge Dev. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:31 pm
–===– —===— From the law:/dev/null competition-related archives: Life Comes at You Fast (Part III) (05/28/15) [this post] A Mercenary’s Lament (02/11/14) Going out on a W (04/01/12) Greetings from Washington (briefly)! [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 6:42 pm
Co-Operation and Dev., January 1st, 1996, available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/23/61/2102514.pdf.[5] Id.[6] Id.[7] Lawrence Lessig, Innovation, Regulation, and the Internet, The American Prospect, November 30, 2002, http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles? [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:48 am
Easton Land & Dev., Inc., 723 F.2d 1549, 1551 (11th Cir.1984). [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 01, 2007 Crown Point Dev., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 9:36 am
Dev. for Tex. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:49 pm
Holly Dev. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:50 am
Nolana Dev. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:49 pm
Global Global – General Public Knowledge’s IP3 Award (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge) IP value creation at IBM and Microsoft – compare and contrast (IAM) Global – Copyright RIAA ‘protects’ Radiohead’s In Rainbows (TorrentFreak) Nokia criticizes ACTA substance and process (Michael Geist) Game Dev: Sometimes it’s ok to steal my games (TorrentFreak) Global – Trade Marks & Domain Names Rogue seal runs rampant in wiki world: FBI on the… [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 11:25 am
Dev. for Tex. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am
Autism Dev. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:38 am
., 84 F.3d 614, 619 (2d Cir. 1996) (citing Perma Research & Dev. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:02 pm
Although the parties conceptualized the injunction as an anti-suit injunction in their briefs, citing cases such as China Trade & Dev. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm
Dev. for Tex. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am
Dev. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am
.{**168 AD3d at 75} Even assuming AMS was negligent in failing to move for attorneys’ fees, by agreeing as part of the settlement[FN2] to forgo any award of attorneys’ fees except for $20,000, plaintiff cannot show that but for AMS’s negligence she would not have sustained the loss (see generally Tydings v Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP, 43 AD3d 680, 682 [1st Dept 2007], affd 11 NY3d 195 [2008] [to establish proximate cause, the plaintiff must demonstrate that… [read post]
6 May 2016, 11:06 am
ROM Dev. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:24 am
The plaintiff's work constituted a significant physical change and, therefore, falls under the enumerated activity of "altering" within the meaning of Labor Law § 240(1) (see Scotti v Federation Dev. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:39 am
San, LLC v Zucker & Kwestel, LLP, 112 AD3d 796, 797 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ginsburg Dev. [read post]
