Search for: "Doe v. Smith" Results 1341 - 1360 of 7,274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Therefore, the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply (see Matter of Pharaohs GC, Inc. v New York State Liq. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am by stu@crimapp.com
Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003) (incorporating the American Bar Association Guidelines For the Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases as the professional standard of performance), and Rompilla v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 11:02 am by Eric Goldman
Calcagni * Griper Selling Anti-Walmart Items Through CafePress Doesn’t Infringe or Dilute–Smith v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
 | Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
In 2000 Mance L.J. said in Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland: “Copyright does not lie on the same continuum as, nor is it the antithesis of, freedom of expression. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" That skepticism does now show the planners were digging its heals and making it clear that it would deny all variances. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:08 pm
But last week we ran across a case dismissing an unjust enrichment claim on a ground we hadn’t considered – privity.In Smith v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:30 am by INFORRM
  If the statement does not refer to an identifiable person, it is not defamatory. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
 So he gets entirely off.On the one hand, Justice Smith writes a very persuasive opinion. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Dennis Aftergut
In contrast to Smith’s approach, judge-shopping from the start in Missouri v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:47 am
P. 4(a)(1)(A) qualified as a notice of appeal:In Smith v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 32500 (ND NY, March 16, 2010), a New York federal magistrate judge rejected an inmate's claim that a strip frisk after a Catholic Family Day event deterred him from attending other Catholic religious services.In Smith v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:37 am by Oona Hathaway
Hathaway, Gerard D. and Bernice Latrobe Smith Professor of International Law at Yale Law School. [read post]