Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 7,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2016, 11:58 pm
Medical pay of $5,000.00 was also waived on top of the costs and verdict so the end result came to $19,038.19.San Diego Superior Court Case No. #37-2014-00033685-CU-PA-CTLCase Name: JACQUELINE WONG V. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:58 pm
Medical pay of $5,000.00 was also waived on top of the costs and verdict so the end result came to $19,038.19.San Diego Superior Court Case No. #37-2014-00033685-CU-PA-CTLCase Name: JACQUELINE WONG V. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:48 am
Benson, et al; Mecklenburg County File No. 08 CVS 13456 As a Superior Court ruling (rather than Court of Appeals or Supreme Court), this holding is not binding on other North Carolina Courts, but it does serve to help answer the questions posed in the my earlier post. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443 with respect to contractual class action waivers in the context of non-waivable labor law rights? [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
Rakusen v Jepsen and others [2023] UKSC 9, where the Court will determine whether a Rent Repayment Order can only be made against an immediate landlord or can a superior landlord also be liable. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:52 am
This post examines an opinion the Superior Court of Pennsylvania recently issued in a criminal case: Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 4:46 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:31 am
Death of parent having custody; reversion of custody to surviving parent; appointment of guardian by superior court; removalIn case of the death of the parent to whom the care and custody of the minor children shall have been awarded by the Superior Court, or in the case of the death of the parent in whose custody the children actually are, when the parents have been living separate and no award as to the custody of such children has been made, the care and… [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 9:20 am
The post Does the D.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:14 pm
" All that this holding does is give a party the opportunity to argue the matter to the lower court -- a court that now knows which way the wind blows because the Court of Appeal has expressly told 'em. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:26 pm
A July 2015 appellate court decision, State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1023 (2012). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:56 am
State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
The Worcester Superior Court's decision earlier this year in Goodman v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 1:02 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice released its decision on an application in York University v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
Smith does not claim a cognizable injury under Rodearmel. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:08 am
Utility Consumers’ Action Network v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:03 am
Crest v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
S. 96 (1944), the Court stated that “the exercise of due diligence does not relieve the owner of his obligation” to provide a seaworthy ship and, in the same ruling, held that the fellow-servant doctrine did not provide a defense. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:03 am
Huber v. [read post]
