Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 4,706
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2019, 10:39 am
Id. at pp. 41-42 & 44-45. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:06 pm
(It does not revive lapsed claims.) [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
S. 96 (1944), the Court stated that “the exercise of due diligence does not relieve the owner of his obligation” to provide a seaworthy ship and, in the same ruling, held that the fellow-servant doctrine did not provide a defense. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
Under this exception, a record that is otherwise inadmissible as hearsay may be admissible if the proponent demonstrates that (1) the records were kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity; (2) it was the regular practice of that business activity to make the records; (3) the records were made at or near the time of the events recorded; and (4) the records were made by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation stating that the second amended complaint should be dismissed with prejudice, agreeing with the county that Title VII does not include claims of discrimination based on sexual orientation and dismissing the added claim for sex discrimination based on gender stereotype for sufficient factual allegations to support the claim. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:30 pm
But where does the idea of a so-called negotiation class come from and how would it work? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:02 pm
While US Examiners cited non-patent literature on average 13% of the time, the PTAB was more than three times more likely to do so (41%). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 1:18 pm
The original application, covering classes 9, 16, 25, 28, 35, 38, 41 and 43 was divided into two applications on 1 August 2019, around a week after the public backlash began. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
§ 41 et seq. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:18 am
Wallace, 351 N.C. 481, 503-04, 528 S.E.2d 326, 340-41 (2000). [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:26 am
The wording of the claims is not relevant for the present decision and is not reproduced here.Reasons for the DecisionPriority right (Article 87(1) EPC)1. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:29 pm
The Act does provide far broader protections to journalists from warrants, wiretaps, or production orders under s. 488.02(5) of the Criminal Code. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
In sum, no matter how bad a job the Grouper does, it can hardly do worse than the current procedure. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
The Court addressed the following four issues: (1) Is the question of whether the Prime Minister’s advice to the Queen was lawful justiciable in a court of law? [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:37 am
G.S. 7B-2506(1)(c). [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
About one in four women in senior management or executive roles says she does not have a good work/life balance compared with men. 3. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:54 pm
” Id. at § 2000e-1(a). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:47 pm
It is certainly the first decision I have seen. 43 Dudmaston, Telford, Shropshire TF3 2DF: BIR/00GF/HSH/2019/0001 This is the First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decision on applications by the Borough of Telford and Wrekin for a banning order against David Beattie under section 15(1) Housing and Planning Act 2016 and for a rent repayment order under section 41 H&PA 2016. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 2:59 am
There should be “no element of subjectivity –– given that it is detrimental to legal certainty –– in the process of identifying the protected subject matter” (at [41]). [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:14 am
This version (in clean form) is what will be law effective January 1, 2020, if Governor Newsom signs these bills into law before October 13 (which he is expected to do). [read post]
