Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 1341 - 1360 of 9,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2013, 8:08 pm by Jon McLaughlin
 House Bill 1452 creates a rebuttable presumption in every case that it is in the best interest of a child that each parent should be allocated not less than 35% residential parenting time.[3] A court does have authority to restrict parental responsibilities to protect a child's mental, moral, or physical, or emotional health.[4] Allocation of parental responsibilities. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am by Brett Trout
Claim 1 of the Bilski patent application read as follows: 1. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
Here is the procedure so far: 1. [read post]
Magenheimer that the Indiana Tort Claims Act (“ITCA”) does not govern a claim under Indiana Code chapter 35-47-11.1, which prohibits political subdivisions from regulating firearms (“Indiana Firearms Preemption Act” or “IFP Act”). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
Separation Of Powers – Who Does What In The US Government II. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm by Gene Quinn
The patent cases where Justice Scalia authored the opinion for the Supreme Court are: Eli Lilly, Inc. v Medtronic, Inc., 496 U.S. 661 (1990), decided 7-2: the Supreme Court decided that 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(1) exempted from infringement the use of patented inventions reasonably related to the development and submission of information needed to obtain marketing approval of medical devices under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 12:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2018) In its 2016 en banc opinion in this case, the Federal Circuit limited the scope of the on sale bar of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 1:25 pm
Tickets $35 in advance (purchase using Paypal at www.SDNYC.org) or $40 at door. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Michael Heller
Why are they breaking out now, and what does this tell us about the hidden rules of ownership?] [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 2:02 am by Darrin Mish
Even the rich and famous does not escape the taxman. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 2:55 am by Darrin Mish
Even the rich and famous does not escape the taxman. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:42 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
  The settlement provided that Sarah would have custody of the child 65% of the time, and Jon would have the child in his care 35% of the time. [read post]