Search for: "Exelis Systems Corporation "
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
†A sort of Darwinian survival of the fittest system, the AmeriKat thinks. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music (EDTexweblog.com) BPAI used… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
Run to the USPTO (IP Frontline) Director’s blog, now with feedback (just_n_examiner) Effective 8 November, Office’s revised count system initiatives go into effect (just_n_examiner) Should you file a patent application now or can you wait? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
Run to the USPTO (IP Frontline) Director’s blog, now with feedback (just_n_examiner) Effective 8 November, Office’s revised count system initiatives go into effect (just_n_examiner) Should you file a patent application now or can you wait? [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
In the latter case, there is a "need for strong internal controls and ex post facto monitoring". [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:33 am
Visit Corporate Counsel
Pressure Builds for In-House Attorneys
The Connecticut Law Tribune
More work. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:16 am
Surely our legal system has the ability to stop shams.Written by Carol L. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:31 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:38 am
Institutional MMFs, which now account for approximately 60% of MMF assets, function as low-cost providers of a corporate treasury function for large business entities. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Microsoft indemnifies its big corporate customers, and so stepped in. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:02 am
On Wednesday, California's 6th District Court of Appeal threw out a trial court win for Kaleidescape, maker of high-end home entertainment systems that allow people to copy and store DVDs. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
The suit asked to set aside the allegedly improper transactions and to have the title to the real properties transferred to the corporation. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 10:57 am
These names are undoubtedly unfamiliar to many of the IPKat's readers, but the corporation to whom they were lobbying for will be - Google Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 1:13 am
Milone also detailed other cost-cutting measures, including a decision to eliminate lockstep compensation in favor of a performance-based system. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) GOOD magazine article on Erich Spangenberg: The ethics of patent trolling (The Prior Art) US Patents – Decisions CAFC to hear claim and continuation rule case en banc; litigation schedule set: Tafas v Doll (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Gray on Claims) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Properly construed claims failed to read on preferred… [read post]
