Search for: "F/V "PREVAIL""
Results 1341 - 1360
of 3,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2013, 9:17 am
Rusk, 172 F.3d 481 (7th cir. 1999) (allowing termination at will of copyright license with no specified term), with Rano v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:43 am
” “ Here, the plaintiffs failed to plead that, but for the defendants’ negligence, they would have prevailed in the underlying action (see Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506; Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813). [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 1:39 pm
’”). [13] In re Hotels.com, 573 F.3d at 1302 (quoting Ramsey v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court Industrial Union Dep’t v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 1:51 pm
Cir. 2015) (citing Atofina, 441 F.3d at 999; ClearValue, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US: Gene patenting debate continues: UCLA v USPTO (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (PatentlyBIOtech) (Patent Docs) (IP Watchdog) US: FTC issues highly anticipated report on follow-on biologics; report concludes that special legislative exclusivity incentives are largely unwarranted for innovators and generics (FDA Law Blog) (Patent Docs) (Patent… [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US: Gene patenting debate continues: UCLA v USPTO (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (PatentlyBIOtech) (Patent Docs) (IP Watchdog) US: FTC issues highly anticipated report on follow-on biologics; report concludes that special legislative exclusivity incentives are largely unwarranted for innovators and generics (FDA Law Blog) (Patent Docs)… [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 11:26 am
WestEnd Capital Mgmt., L.L.C., et al., 832 F.3d 534, 546 (5th Cir. 2016) (JAMS Rules); Petrofac, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 10:01 pm
Plant v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party—here, the State—and defer to the suppression court's factual findings unless clearly erroneous. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:44 am
For example, in Sepulveda v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:38 pm
V. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 9:33 am
Trump and Stockman v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 1:54 pm
Goldfarb, 154 F.3d 1321 (Fed. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
World Champ Tech LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:08 pm
Advanced Systems had prevailed at the lower court, obtaining a preliminary injunction. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:19 am
The Supreme Court ruled today, in Southern Union v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 6:49 pm
Estee Lauder Companies, Inc., 946 F. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:49 pm
Aleutian Spray Fisheries, Inc., 2009 WL 1916070, plaintiff David Acosta was employed as a fisherman aboard the F/V Siberian Sea. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 11:02 am
Miyano Machinery USA, Inc. v. [read post]
