Search for: "Givens v. Givens" Results 1341 - 1360 of 67,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2009, 2:54 pm by Bruce M. Robinson
When defending a DUI charge, there are many nuances both prior to the actual arrest and the procedure of the arrest itself that must be properly identified by experienced DUI counsel in order achieve the best possible result in any given case. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 2:54 pm
When defending a DUI charge, there are many nuances both prior to the actual arrest and the procedure of the arrest itself that must be properly identified by experienced DUI counsel in order achieve the best possible result in any given case. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 12:00 am by William Gaskill
United States v Margheim Margheim appealed his convictions arguing his statutory and constitutional speedy trial rights had been violated. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:04 am by J
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State (No.2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639 is one that we may have missed when it first came out (or we decided not to do it – we can’t quite remember now), but, given that I have some free time this morning, I thought I’d do a short note on it. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 11:00 pm
Here is the case that prompted Congress to enact the The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009: Ledbetter v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 11:22 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
 But how much time are you given to find an attorney before you are given a Breathalyzer? [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:16 pm by Walter Olson
Eve Tushnet wonders why that is (scroll to “custodian of souls”; earlier on the pending Supreme Court case, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am by Ben Henriques, Corker Binning
Whilst the court decided that no direction on the meaning of substantial was necessary in most cases, it also had to decide what direction should be given in those minority of cases where a direction is given. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:41 pm
Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), and Brosseau v. [read post]