Search for: "Grant v. United States"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 28,871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2023, 12:40 pm
USA v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
(In United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 2:01 pm
The change order in question is a monument to ambiguity, only stating a unit price deduction and the description “work performed by others”. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
China Southern Airlines] shows stylistic and reasoning flaws that do not generally appear in decisions issued by United States Courts of Appeals. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am
Sigalit v Kahlon Last week, in Sigalit v Kahlon, 21-cv-08921 (SDNY Aug. 30, 2023) United States District Judge Analisa Torres granted the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on an accounting claim. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
(Please note that these figures do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am
The only exception to the exclusive licence was said to be “Ford’s existing non-exclusive licence in the United Kingdom”.CSL argued that the express carve-out for the United Kingdom could only make sense if the 1997 licence was being granted worldwide, and that the reference to “federal” marks was simply loose language. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Music and Copyright IPKat provides a summary of the three cases brought in the United States claiming that the song Thinking Out Loud performed by Ed Sheeran, copied Let’s Get It On performed by Marvin Gaye. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:44 am
Today The Hill published my article on Texas v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 6:53 am
Here is a 2023, 19 page opinion from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:50 am
” The United States Supreme Court has recognized that the Establishment Clause is violated where there is clearly no secular purpose for the state action being challenged and the “activity was motivated wholly by religious considerations. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:08 pm
The United States Copyright Office (“USCO”) denied the application because the work “lack[ed] the human authorship necessary to support a copyright claim. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 12:26 pm
& Magnolia Oil v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
" Defendant argues that Ashcroft v. [read post]
