Search for: "He v. Holder" Results 1341 - 1360 of 5,732
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2018, 3:40 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In other words, Patrick contended, he remained a “holder” under BCL 1104-a of “shares representing twenty percent or more of the votes” of Moklam. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am by Peter Mahler
He further alleged that he “understood” that the LLCs “were to be passive entities meant solely as holding companies,” i.e., not generating revenue or incurring expenses, and not requiring funding by their members. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:12 am by Jani Ihalainen
The US Court of Appeals took on this question not long ago.The case of Cobbler Nevada LLC v Thomas Gonzales concerned the movie ‘The Cobbler’, for which Cobbler Nevada owned the copyrights to. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:12 am by Jani Ihalainen
The US Court of Appeals took on this question not long ago.The case of Cobbler Nevada LLC v Thomas Gonzales concerned the movie ‘The Cobbler’, for which Cobbler Nevada owned the copyrights to. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:24 pm by Barry Sookman
The issue was resolved earlier today by the Supreme Court in Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:33 pm by Daniel Nathan
” The SEC found that notwithstanding “[t]he lack of monetary consideration for purportedly ‘free’ shares,” the issuance of the TOM tokens as a “gift” of a security through the Bounty Program constituted a “sale” or “offer to sell” within the meaning of the Securities Act as stated in SEC v. [read post]