Search for: "Herring v. Edwards"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,033
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
Daniel Abnett on his Employment Law blog commented on this case, explaining that a major factor defeating the claim was the fact that the claimant sought to rely on her own illegal actions in court, despite the court accepting that she was a vulnerable person. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:23 pm
Russell Realty Associates v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:18 am
The school pointed to a recent Supreme Court ruling in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:03 pm
Although she managed to demonstrate the investigative techniques used against her were excessive and thereby halted her prosecution, she had no overarching public interest defence. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:09 am
Edwards had violated it.“It doesn’t seem to me that the jury needs help,” she said. “It just doesn’t seem that complicated to me.” I'd like to know how hearsay testimony that Elizabeth Edwards ripped off her shirt and bra to scream at her husband, or that Rielle Hunter called her spiritual adviser when a Reuben sandwich came with the wrong dressing, is relevant to Edwards' intent in accepting… [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:52 pm
I don't see what John Edwards has to gain by testifying. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:42 am
Edward M. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:51 am
Klarman’s assessment of the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
For those who do not have time, the short version is that the court rejected three distinct arguments: that the government violated Edwards by questioning the defendant without counsel present in the aftermath of his capture, that the defendants’ trio of subsequent written waivers of his Miranda and prompt-presentment rights were invalid, and that the government violated the 5th and 6th amendments by preventing defendant’s counsel from locating him after his capture. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:14 am
Well, not so fast said Superior Court Judge Edward P. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:18 am
Since the Supreme Court had not acquired personal jurisdiction over the defendant, the default judgment entered against her was a nullity (see Fleisher v Kaba, 78 AD3d 1118, 1120; Steele v Hempstead Pub Taxi, 305 AD2d at 402). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
For more information on the ownership, the evolution of Texas water rights, and the emerging authority of groundwater control districts in Texas, check out the this year’s Texas Supreme Court decision of The Edwards Aquifer Authority and the State of Texas v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:03 pm
Pidd chose to save some information for her reports, so she could add further context. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:13 pm
Princess said that the captain, Captain Edward Perrin, and the officer on watch, would definitely have taken action if they had been properly notified. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 8:31 am
" The case, Medlen v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:25 pm
Edward Perrin, or the officer of the watch. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 11:07 am
In 1972, a year before Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
So I was interested to see another case taking on this thorny issue in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:13 pm
The Third District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court in Frazier v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:49 am
In November 1987, Betty and her husband, Edward, applied for and were issued a joint life insurance policy with United. [read post]
