Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  Duration of the disturbance (Criteria B, C, D, and E) is more than 1 month. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Arkansas where (a) the prosecution advises a trial court that the appointment of a particular lawyer in a capital case to represent multiple defendants may create a conflict of interest; (b) the appointed lawyer informs the court that he is financially unable to appoint capitally certified counsel for each of the co-defendants; (c) the court acknowledges these conflicts of interest, but delegates resolution of them to the same lawyer; (d) the conflicted attorney… [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Such is statutorily codified as, "the needs and best interests of the respondent as well as the need for protection of the community" and, except for a designated felony, consistent therewith the Court shall order the least restrictive alternative disposition. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
Baby Girl 12-399Issue: (1) Whether a non-custodial parent can invoke the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA), 25 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 4:44 am by Susan Brenner
[Cupples] would expose the victim's `vaginal area,’ and he `touche[d her]’ with `his fingers’. . . . [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 5:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Criminal Lawyer said, the Sergeant charged the Defendant with a violation of New York State Vehicle and Traffic Law §1180(d). [read post]
29 May 2013, 3:11 pm by familoo
It’s not for lack of interest that I have not so far blogged about it, I’ve just been a bit overwhelmed with work, trying to snatch a moment here and there to digest the consultation document and ponder its ramifications for family law. [read post]
16 May 2013, 9:25 am by Kelly Buchanan
  I thought I’d check back to see if any similar rules were included in previous legislation. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
., 20 N.Y.3d 995, 985 N.E.2d 127, 961 N.Y.S.2d 363 (2013) the Court of Appeals observed that before a party can be estopped from denying paternity or from obtaining a DNA test that may establish that he is not the child's biological parent, the court must be convinced that applying equitable estoppel is in the child's best interest (Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320 [2006]). [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Similarly, the divorce judgment was deficient in its failure to include the notice required by Domestic Relations Law §236(B)(7)(d). [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
Code §2252(a)(4)(B), receiving obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Is it trying to persuade you to do something you’d do anyway? [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:00 am by koherston
Second, Stepfather must show that termination of Father’s rights is in the best interest of the child. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am by Susan Brenner
  The problem, for Bowersox, is that § 1466A(b)(1) is not a possession of child pornography statute like the one at issue in Ashcroft. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 10:19 am by David Fraser
The order can be broad or narrow, and the bill gives the courts wide latitude:9 (1) A protection order may include any of the following provisions that the justice considers necessary or advisable for the protection of the subject:(a) a provision prohibiting the respondent from engaging in cyberbullying;(b) a provision restricting or prohibiting the respondent from, directly or indirectly, communicating with or contacting the subject or a specified person;(c) a provision restricting or… [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
Jewell then filed defamation lawsuits against a number of media outlets, including NBC, CNN, the New York Post, and Cox Enterprises d/b/a the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm by Law Lady
., d/b/a BOYNTON BEACH MALL and SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., Appellee. 4th District.Child custody -- Time sharing -- Order modifying parenting plan to suspend mother's time-sharing during father's week to remedy her noncompliance with previous parenting plan is reversed because it fails to reflect that the change is temporary as the oral pronouncement held -- Remand for clarification that remedial custody arrangement is temporary -- Attorney's fees -- Trial court abused discretion… [read post]