Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 5,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2008, 11:19 am
At least if you're like me you do. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
(Cal. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 6:08 am
“The [rep] committee wants to line the field and put up the goalposts so we know the boundaries for what we’re trying to do,” city councilman and member of the committee Kit Bobko told Patch. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
" Then, when you're being escorted out of the courtroom in order to prevent further outbursts in front of the jury, you add: "I need to see my doctor. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:46 am
That you know the authorities are listening seems to me to be evidence that you're not serious when you say you're going to kill someone. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 8:51 am
Cal. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
So important is this goal of family maintenance and reunification that the California Supreme Court has noted, "up until the time the section 366.26(termination of parental rights) hearing is set, the parent's interest in reunification is given precedence over the child's need for stability and permanency" [ In re Marilyn H. (1993) 5 Cal. 4th 295, 310, 19 Cal. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 8:31 am
In re: Governorship, 26 Cal. 3d 110 (S. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:48 am
Cal. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:56 am
Particularly when you're an attorney who's trying to overturn sanctions imposed against you for repeatedly not showing up in court when you were expressly ordered to do so by the judge.Here's just a portion of the Court of Appeal's reaction to what the attorney in question -- San Luis Obispo attorney Darryl Genis -- thought would be a good way to conduct an appellate oral argument:"It is not an overstatement to categorize Appellant’s oral… [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 2:04 pm
Both of them are pretty darn sophisticated in assessing whether being sentenced to death actually means they're going to die. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:19 pm
Sure, if they're nice, the person who wrote the check will probably send you a replacement. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 5:02 pm
I see the argument.But there are still two owners listed on the document, Sotheby's (allegedly) released the diamonds to one of the two listed owners, and Section 1828 of the Civil Code says you're allowed to do that without any liability attaching. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 12:18 pm
Yes, the statute allows "costs" to be recoverable, and yes, counties don't incur many "costs" in these proceedings because they're a municipality. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 2:25 pm
"You're going to like the way you look. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
He contested the ticket -- as you're allowed to do -- by filing a statement online that simply denied that he was parked for more than two hours. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 12:47 pm
No reason to grant review if you're just going to affirm a relatively insignificant opinion below.So I'd guess it didn't take up all that much of the Court's time. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:33 am
(In Re Carrillo 219 Cal.App.4th 572). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:35 pm
(Cal. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:58 am
Cal. 2009) (Actimmune I); In re Actimmune Marketing Litig. [read post]
