Search for: "In re Marriage of House" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,076
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2012, 10:19 am by PunditMom
Romney recently told one voter at a campaign stop, “If you’re looking for free stuff, vote for [Obama]. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 11:18 am by Bill Raftery
Indiana HB 1166 Provides that a court may not apply, enforce, or grant comity, res judicata, claim preclusion, or issue preclusion to a foreign law, ruling, or judgment if doing so would violate the fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges guaranteed by the United States Constitution or the Constitution of the State of Indiana. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:59 am by William Carleton
Title IV This is an attempt to re-vitalize Reg A. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 8:40 am by admin
There are a number of reasons for that, from overconsumption to stock market and housing crashes to believing the mirage of never-ending youth. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 2:28 am by Richard Mumford
In rejecting DL’s argument and finding that the parens patriae (“parent of the nation”) jurisdiction of the High Court was maintained in relation to vulnerable if “capacitous” adults, the Court of Appeal referred at length to the extensive discussion of this area of the law contained in the judgment of Munby J in Re: SA (Vulnerable adult with capacity: marriage) [2005] EWHC 2942 (Fam). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 5:30 am by J. Benjamin Stevens
Now that you’re single the exemption is only $250,000. 3. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:28 pm by admin
 The IRS doesn’t recognize gay marriage because of the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm
This is likely the reason people mistakenly believe that marriage results in the "merge" of credit. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by David Bernstein
If the Republicans take control of the White House and Senate in 2013, would he want them to set a national policy on gay marriage via the commerce power? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:02 pm
Van Jones laughs, riffing on the "come out" language in the question: "Do you think President Obama would lose some of the black vote if in fact he did come out in support of gay marriage. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm by Law Lady
., d/b/a FINANCIAL CREDIT SERVICES, Appellee. 2nd District.Constitutional law -- Separation of powers -- Legislative privilege -- A member of Florida House of Representatives and his aide are entitled to claim legislative privilege as a ground for refusing to testify in a civil case -- Trial court erred in failing to quash subpoenas directing Representative and his aide to appear for depositions to ask them how they obtained documents which had been acquired and distributed in the course of… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:05 pm
As the court observed in In re Marriage of Morrison, [citation omitted], 'It certainly may be inferred that by specifically setting forth this factor, the Legislature intended that all supported spouses who were able to do so should seek employment. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court determined that the petition was barred by res judicata and dismissed the petition. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm by Albie Myburgh
While marriage may never be in the cards, people still build their lives together, with all the entanglements that can bring – including children, cars, houses and bank accounts. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:16 am by admin
  “They’re holding on to their three-bedroom, so we’re stuck in a two-bedroom,” said ShaMecca Asia, who lived in a two-bedroom in Pomonok Houses with her four daughters, in an apartment crammed with bunk beds, for more than 10 years. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:35 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The Respect for Marriage Act, which would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, has co-sponsors in almost a third of the House of Representatives and the Senate. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Bill Raftery
Indiana HB 1166 Provides that a court may not apply, enforce, or grant comity, res judicata, claim preclusion, or issue preclusion to a foreign law, ruling, or judgment if doing so would violate the fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges guaranteed by the United States Constitution or the Constitution of the State of Indiana. [read post]