Search for: "Jack Goldsmith"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2010, 5:18 pm
UPDATE: Jack Goldsmith responds to my post by arguing that it “is not right to claim that those who support the President’s authority to make such decisions free from judicial review do not believe in legal constraints on the presidency. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 9:18 am
It’s not just a check the box consideration, a pro forma nod to a co-equal political branch; as Jack Goldsmith pointed out in The Terror Presidency, it is a good idea all on its own for plans hatched in a hermetically sealed executive branch environment to be presented to a group of legislators if only so that there is a broad based review on grounds of basic common sense. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:41 am
This of course is part of a general meme pursued by people like me, Ben Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, Bobby Chesney, and oth [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 7:05 am
by Kevin Jon Heller In the past few hours, both Jack Goldsmith and Ben Wittes have argued that the Obama administration has “reluctantly” claimed that the ACLU/CCR lawsuit must be dismissed because of the state-secrets privilege. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:20 am
(Opinion here) Jack Goldsmith, at Lawfare, on the use of law as a weapon of war. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 6:58 pm
” by Jack Goldsmith at Lawfare. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:45 pm
DAVID ADDINGTON GOES TO HERITAGE, Jack Goldsmith comments. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:02 pm
(Orin Kerr) Over at the Lawfare Blog, Jack Goldsmith offers an interesting take on the recent announcement that David Addington has joined the Heritage Foundation as its new Vice President of Domestic and Economic Policy Studies. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:39 am
I rely on Jack Goldsmith and Tim Wu’s ideas here that the Internet has allowed enough regulability by nation states so that a nation state where victims have suffered (or are suffering) losses could assist them even if it had nothing to do with the threat itself. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:05 am
Jack Goldsmith has thoughts at his new blog (with co-authors) Lawfare. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:48 pm
Here’s the intro to the blog from Ben’s first post on Wednesday: Welcome to Lawfare, a new blog by Robert Chesney, Jack Goldsmith, and myself. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 1:03 pm
. . . to Lawfare: Hard National Security Choices by Robert Chesney, Jack Goldsmith and Ben Wittes. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:53 pm
Robert Chesney, Jack Goldsmith and Ben Wittes just launched an exciting new blog entitled "Lawfare: Hard National Security Choices" or The Lawfare Blog for short (my shortening). [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:51 pm
Blog scribes Ben Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, and Robert Chesney penned in the opening post: The name Lawfare refers both to the use of law as a weapon of conflict and, perhaps more importantly, to the depressing reality that America remains at war with itself over the law governing its warfare with others. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:14 pm
by Duncan Hollis Bobby Chesney, Jack Goldsmith, and Ben Wittes have started a new blog, Lawfare: Hard National Security Choices. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:54 am
He not only worked on national security issues for the government prior to Hamdan, but as an academic supported the use of national security courts (with Jack Goldsmith), and he subsequently represented the Obama Administration in successfully arguing against both the challenge to rendition in the Arar case and the claim that habeas corpus rights should be extended to detainees held at Bagram Air Force Base (drawing criticism from the left and the New York Times editorial… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:25 pm
I have no doubt that, as Jack Goldsmith said, the authors did act in good faith, operating under considerable pressure post-9/11. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:53 pm
I think it is a movie that Jack Goldsmith and anyone else working on cyber and robotics issues should see (I will assume that Glenn Reynolds has already watched it ... twice). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:00 am
Jack Goldsmith is a very impressive guy and I found his book about his service in the Bush administration at OLC fascinating. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
Jonathan Adler at the Volokh Conspiracy commends Professor Jack Goldsmith, a witness for the Democrats, for telling the Committee yesterday that the “decision to nominate a highly qualified individual who swims in the broad mainstream of American legal life – a description that Kagan easily satisfies – warrants deference from the Senate. [read post]
