Search for: "Just v. Chambers" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm by familoo
I’ve also been hugely exercised by the Foolscap v A4 references in Re L. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
However, despite subsequent Chamber judgments to similar effect (see, eg, Österreichische Vereinigung v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
  * To Kill a Mockingbird; the challenge where where sequel is prequel Many decades after the publication of To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee’s lawyer said they had just found an unpublished sequel of that classic novel, which will be launched in July 2015. [read post]
My favourite days have been when members of Cloisters (my lovely colleagues from chambers) have been in court – I just about manage to refrain from waving at them from behind the bench! [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:33 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
Hill was the very first antipodean composer to have a chamber work committed to record, and some of those same precious early recordings have been preserved by the National Archive of Australia, and brought to the world free of copyright restrictions. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
Oral arguments in King v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 2:20 pm by Jani
With this in mind, a new development quietly emerged from the chambers of the European Court of Justice some time ago, which piqued this writer's interest. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 2:12 pm by Joe Patrice
Does the Chamber of Commerce think this argument is just too dumb to stake their reputation? [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Chamber the wrong [Liberty and Law, more] No, the justices don’t just use religious freedom cases to advance their own beliefs [Eugene Volokh] Can/should the courts correct misconduct by the EEOC in dealings with employers during the “conciliation” phase before litigation? [read post]