Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
As Wikipedia explains, “The United States district courts are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Global Process Systems v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Berhad [2011] UKSC 5. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 8:19 am
Baker v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm
Recently, in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm
Re (@RichardMRe) October 2, 2022 Relatedly, there are Rick Pildes's and Orin Kerr's earlier posts about the concept of judicial courage. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 11:52 am
” United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:38 pm
Frederick; Orin Kerr weighs in here. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:22 am
The panel made its decision based upon a previous decision by the circuit, 1979’s Blum v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:39 am
In her appeal, Evans argued that the trial court improperly failed to consider existing 11th Circuit decisions, such as 2011’s Glenn v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:47 pm
In my view, a far better answer to the government’s argument is that the mandate isn’t “proper” even if it is “necessary” and that it runs afoul of the five part test recently outlined by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 2:36 pm
Creamer, Walker v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:43 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 7:23 am
(For example, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 3:04 am
” This conclusion was reaffirmed by the Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am
To the extent there's a saving grace, it's that even border searches must be reasonable, though up to now, the operative law treats computers like any other sealed container and considers a search of a laptop to be routine, per the 1985 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 5:01 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19 Smith v… [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 6:44 pm
Palestine Liberation Organization and its companion case, United States v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:15 am
The Duty to Respond to Public Comments In Perez v. [read post]
