Search for: "King v. United States Government" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2011, 6:10 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which the Court interpreted the scope of the federal witness tampering statute can be applied, while James Bickford summarized the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:26 am by James Bickford
  In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on the sequels to Citizens United, which are raising “[i]ssues such as how the government may regulate disclosure of spending, and whether bans on direct corporate contributions to candidates” are permissible. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:19 am by Orin Kerr
United States, that has a fascinating set of opinions. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:23 am by Kiera Flynn
” Gun rights groups have filed an amicus brief in support of the federal government’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am by Lovechilde
Board of Education - one of the most important decisions ever handed down by the United States Supreme Court - illuminating the way forward. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
Florida (10-1139), raising the issue of whether a state government interferes with foreign policy by barring state college professors from using any funds to visit Cuba or any other “terrorist state”; and Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela, et al., v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 2:40 am by Jeff Gamso
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated our judgment and remanded this case to us for further consideration in light of  Florida v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 25, 1935. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The United States of America and his Majesty the King of Denmark, being desirous to confirm their friendly relations and to promote the cause of justice, have resolved to conclude a treaty for the extradition of fugitives from justice, and have appointed for that purpose the following plenipotentiaries: The President of the United States of America, John Hay, Secretary of State of the United States; and His Majesty the… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:52 am by Orin Kerr
This has gone through a few iterations, ranging from the remarks of a government official in 2007 suggesting that corporate clients of their firms might want to rethink being clients there to the efforts in 2010 to suggest that Gitmo lawyers were disloyal to the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
It's ironic that, even as we see the federal government assert its authority over local affairs in legislation such as PPACA and cases like United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:46 am by Andrew Koppelman
That ideal was attractive and even necessary precisely because, since the founding of the United States, the country’s religious composition had changed, with large numbers of Catholic and Jewish immigrants. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:11 pm by David Lat
If so, how does this differ from Biglaw firms defending, say, Guantanamo Bay detainees who want to bring down the United States? [read post]