Search for: "LITTLE v. TERRITORY"
Results 1341 - 1358
of 1,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2007, 7:47 am
The justices have already ruled in Rasul v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:57 pm
(The case is Territory v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 8:20 am
Jonathan Griffiths' "Misattribution and Misrepresentation: the Claim of Reverse Passing Off has 'Paternity' Right" offers an enjoyable and imaginative interplay of English and US statute and case law, while Stina Teilmann's "It's a Wise Text that Knows its Own Father" has introduced him to some hitherto unfamiliar materials, not least of which is the French litigation in the intriguingly-named case of Garnier v Bastard (1895).Bibliographic… [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:25 pm
Yesterday's oral argument in Gentry v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
She said: "why are we in dangerous territory? [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
At the American Military Cemetery Henri-Chapelle in Belgium, near the little villages Homburg and Henri-Chapelle, covering fifty-seven acres, rest 7,992 American military Dead. [read post]
17 May 2007, 8:00 am
" Me: The internal politics of support for self-help funding is unfortunate, but have little to do with the validity, morality, necessity, and importance of a right to civil counsel (let alone any right at all). [read post]
13 May 2007, 5:42 am
I am pretty sure he knows everyone on his territory. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:39 am
", an analytical dissection of a piece of recent judicial history, SOCAN v Canadian Association of Internet Providers, by Susanna H. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:05 am
Mody v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:06 pm
The conclusion reached in the case of Ligue Contre Le Racisme v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
Here is the abstract:Rasul v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:45 am
He claims that because the legislature defines these offenses as the purpose of the wrongdoer, all elements of the crimes occurred in Georgia, outside the territorial jurisdiction of Arkansas.Powell v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 4:32 am
For the reasons given above, I find that the objection under s.3(3)(b) of the Act succeeds".The IPKat has his little anxieties about this decision. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 6:17 pm
. conclusions" of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
It would then need to pass another bill approving the cessation of the specific territories and an amendment adjusting the legal boundaries of those territories as set out in the First Schedule. [read post]
