Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 29,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 3:40 pm
In Mlynarski v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:14 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” Fehr v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 3:01 am
In Eslava v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 3:40 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:32 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 5:15 pm
A forensic safety engineer testified for the defense at the suppression hearing that the air freshened was a dashboard level held by a string one tenth of one inch wide and was not an obstruction of the defendants view as prohibited by the New York State Traffic Law. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:15 am
The Supreme Court released its decision in State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 11:50 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
Mozes v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
The case is South Dakota v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:07 am
But insurers are much more heavily regulated at the state level, and insurance class actions often focus on state statutes. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 4:57 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:34 am
Texas Monthly named state Rep. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:43 pm
The only Supreme Court case that attempts to address this issue is Quill Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:24 am
The assessment of damages is subject to the “ceiling” on damages in defamation cases – which the the Judge suggests is now £256,000 ([26]) – although he noted that it was recently stated to be £230-240,000 in Al-Amoudi v Kifle [2011] EWHC 2037 (QB). [read post]
6 May 2022, 7:04 am
And so campaigning on Roe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:20 am
Timbs’ appeal to the United States Supreme Court was only about the incorporation of the Excessive Fines Clause at the state level, and not its application to civil forfeiture cases. [read post]
