Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 1341 - 1360 of 45,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 12:47 pm
  Even if you only read one line of the 50 single-spaced pages.So rather than "Judge Bybee, concurring in part and dissenting in part," he makes sure the opening description reads:"Bybee, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part, but mostly dissenting:""Mostly dissenting. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 11:59 am
The furloughs are okay.The Governator wins this one, as well as a different case (also decided the same day) about his use of the line-item veto to whack some other appropriations.Two for Ahnold. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 3:17 pm
Hendrik Hertzberg of The New Yorker has joined the long line of lefties sniffing at the questions about Barack Obama's association with William Ayers, which dates at least to a campaign kick-off event in 1995 for... [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:38 am by Kendall Gray
Prometheus Laboratories, involving the line between patentable intellectual property and mere scientific principle; and Coleman v. [read post]
 A federal judge in Missouri recently dismissed a proposed class action by the shoppers against H&M over the company’s marketing of its “Conscious Choice” fashion line. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:53 am
My favorite line of the exchange comes from Rizzo in response to Thaler’s inclusion of private choices by firms to adopt automatic savings plans as examples of “libertarian paternalism”: “Is New Paternalism primarily about advising private individuals and firms? [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
The advantage of a bright-line rule is ease of application. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 6:45 am by Eric P. Robinson
"In light of the recent evolution in the media industry and its shift toward online publication," the brief argues, "this case presents an opportunity for this Court to recognize that nontraditional journalists can claim the constitutional protections of Gertz [v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm by Dave
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm by Dave
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]