Search for: "Long v State" Results 1341 - 1360 of 45,175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2023, 9:58 pm by Simon Gibbs
The latest twist in the long running saga of AB v Secretary of State for Justice [2023] EWHC 72 (KB) (and X v The Transcription Agency LLP & Anor [2023] EWHC 1092 (KB)) is that AB/X, who previously benefited from an anonymity order, has been revealed as high profile solicitor advocate Robin Makin, of Liverpool … Liverpool solicitor Robin Makin named as ‘AB/X’ in anonymity case Read More » [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 10:00 am by Comitz Stanley
As stated above, the judge in this matter harshly criticized Hartford for its delay tactics in this case; however, these long delay tactics by insurance companies’ counsel are not uncommon. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:29 am by Linda A. Kerns, Esquire
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently addressed this very fact pattern in Alayon v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 11:54 am by Brent Wieand
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court began on Tuesday in Health and Hospital Corp. v Talevski. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:22 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
” But as the Beatles put it in The Long and Winding Road, “Anyway, you’ll never know, the many ways I’ve tried, and still they lead me back to the long and winding road. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 7:36 am by Allan Blutstein
Dep't of State (2nd Cir.) -- summary order affirming district court’s decision that agency performed reasonable search for research documents that plaintiff allegedly provided to the United States Embassy in Bangkok, Thailand in 2003.Long v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:25 am by Howard Friedman
The State chose to pass a law it knew was unconstitutional to endorse a decades-long campaign, fueled by national interest groups, to ask the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:14 pm by Gerard Magliocca
The petition asks the Court to extend the Sixth Amendment's unanimous jury requirement to the states and to overrule Apodaca v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 9:37 am
United States, No. 06-6330, justifiably received a lot of attention (see here) because it appears that SCOTUS is finally going to get involved in the long-standing debate over crack sentencing (which has hit new heights since Booker). [read post]